The Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM)
The Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) is an observational clinical tool designed to evaluate change in gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. There are two versions of the GMFM ⏤ the original 88-item measure (GMFM-88) and the more recent 66-item GMFM (GMFM-66) 1. The GMFM-88 should be used when one is interested in determining dimension scores; the GMFM-66 does not calculate dimension scores.
Introduction
The Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) is a standardized observational instrument designed to assess gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy or other neurological conditions affecting movement. It was developed in the late 1980s by researchers at McMaster University in Canada, specifically to address the need for a reliable and sensitive tool to measure changes in motor function over time in children with cerebral palsy. The GMFM has since become a widely used and accepted assessment tool in clinical practice and research, providing valuable information about a child’s motor abilities and their progress with interventions.
The GMFM is based on the premise that gross motor function is a complex skill that involves a variety of movements, including lying, rolling, sitting, crawling, standing, walking, and jumping. The assessment tool measures these movements in a standardized way, allowing for comparisons between different children and across time. The GMFM is designed to be used with children between the ages of 5 months and 16 years, and it can be administered by trained professionals such as physical therapists, occupational therapists, and other healthcare providers.
The GMFM is an observational assessment, meaning that it is based on the therapist’s observation of the child’s performance on a series of tasks. The therapist scores the child’s performance on each task using a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 (unable to perform the task) to 4 (completes independently). The scores for each item are then summed to calculate a total GMFM score, which can be used to track changes in the child’s gross motor function over time.
GMFM-88 and GMFM-66
There are two primary versions of the GMFM⁚ the GMFM-88 and the GMFM-66. The GMFM-88, the original version, consists of 88 items that are organized into five dimensions⁚ lying and rolling, sitting, crawling and kneeling, standing, and walking, running, and jumping. Each dimension is further divided into various items, each representing a specific motor skill. The GMFM-88 is a comprehensive measure of gross motor function and is often used in research settings to assess the effectiveness of interventions for children with cerebral palsy.
The GMFM-66, a shorter version of the GMFM-88, consists of 66 items; It was developed to provide a more efficient assessment tool for clinical settings, particularly for children who are able to walk independently or have higher levels of motor function. The GMFM-66 retains the five dimensions of the GMFM-88 but includes fewer items within each dimension. While it provides a more concise assessment, it does not include all the items in the GMFM-88 and may not be as sensitive to changes in motor function in children with lower levels of function.
The choice between the GMFM-88 and GMFM-66 depends on the specific needs of the child and the purpose of the assessment. For comprehensive assessments and research studies, the GMFM-88 is often preferred. For clinical assessments, particularly in children with higher levels of function, the GMFM-66 may be a more efficient choice. However, it is important to note that the GMFM-66 does not calculate dimension scores, which may be relevant for certain assessments and research applications.
Purpose and Use
The Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) serves as a valuable tool for clinicians and researchers to assess and monitor the gross motor function of children with cerebral palsy (CP). Its primary purpose is to measure changes in motor function over time, allowing for a comprehensive understanding of a child’s progress with interventions, therapies, or even natural developmental milestones. The GMFM can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of various treatment approaches, including physical therapy, occupational therapy, and assistive devices.
Beyond measuring change, the GMFM also provides a standardized way to assess motor abilities in children with CP. This allows for objective comparisons between individuals and across different time points. The standardized nature of the GMFM makes it an essential tool for clinical research, enabling researchers to collect consistent and reliable data on motor function in children with CP. This data can be used to compare treatment outcomes, understand the impact of different interventions, and develop new therapies.
The GMFM’s adaptability and versatility extend to a variety of settings. It is commonly employed in clinical settings, such as physical therapy clinics and hospitals, to monitor progress and tailor treatment plans. It also finds applications in research settings, where it is used to assess the effectiveness of various interventions and treatments for children with CP. The GMFM’s role extends to educational settings, where it can be used to monitor progress and guide the development of individualized education programs (IEPs) for children with CP.
Dimensions of the GMFM
The GMFM is structured around five distinct dimensions, each representing a specific aspect of gross motor function. These dimensions are designed to comprehensively assess the child’s motor abilities across a range of movement patterns, from simple to complex, and are crucial for understanding the child’s overall motor development. The five dimensions of the GMFM are⁚
- Lying and Rolling⁚ This dimension focuses on the child’s ability to move in the supine position, roll over, and maintain a stable position on their back. It evaluates skills such as turning the head, rolling from back to front, and rolling from front to back.
- Sitting⁚ This dimension assesses the child’s ability to sit independently, maintain balance in sitting, and perform various actions while sitting, such as reaching for objects, transferring objects, and maintaining upright posture. It also evaluates the child’s ability to move from a lying position to a sitting position.
- Crawling and Kneeling⁚ This dimension focuses on the child’s ability to crawl, kneel, and transition between these positions. It evaluates skills such as creeping on hands and knees, crawling forward and backward, and kneeling on both knees.
- Standing⁚ This dimension assesses the child’s ability to stand independently, maintain balance while standing, and perform various actions while standing, such as reaching for objects, stepping sideways, and taking steps forward and backward. It also evaluates the child’s ability to transition from sitting to standing.
- Walking, Running, and Jumping⁚ This dimension focuses on the child’s ability to walk, run, and jump. It evaluates skills such as walking independently, running in a straight line, hopping on one foot, and jumping over obstacles.
Each of these dimensions is further divided into multiple items, which are specific tasks or movements that the child is observed performing. The items are designed to be progressively challenging, reflecting the increasing complexity of motor skills as the child develops. By assessing the child’s ability to perform these items, the GMFM provides a comprehensive overview of their gross motor function across different movement patterns.
Administration and Scoring
Administering the GMFM involves a structured observation of the child’s motor performance. The assessment is typically conducted by a trained therapist or assessor who is familiar with the GMFM protocol. The assessment takes place in a quiet and well-lit environment, with the child wearing comfortable clothing that allows for free movement. The assessor observes the child performing each item on the GMFM, noting the child’s ability to complete the task independently, with assistance, or unable to perform it. The scoring system for the GMFM is based on a 3-point scale, with each item receiving a score of 1, 2, or 3, depending on the child’s performance⁚
- Score 1⁚ The child is unable to perform the item, even with assistance. This indicates that the child has not yet developed the necessary motor skills for that particular movement.
- Score 2⁚ The child is able to perform the item with assistance from the assessor or with the use of assistive devices. This indicates that the child has some motor skills for that particular movement but requires support to complete the task.
- Score 3⁚ The child is able to perform the item independently, without assistance or the use of assistive devices. This indicates that the child has fully developed the motor skills required for that particular movement.
The assessor meticulously records the scores for each item on a dedicated scoring sheet. Once all items have been assessed, the scores are summed to calculate a total GMFM score, which represents the child’s overall gross motor function. The GMFM also allows for the calculation of dimension scores, providing a more detailed understanding of the child’s motor abilities within specific areas of movement.
Interpretation of Scores
Interpreting GMFM scores requires a nuanced understanding of the child’s overall development and the context of their specific needs. While the GMFM provides a standardized measure of gross motor function, it is crucial to consider individual factors like age, diagnosis, and previous interventions when analyzing the results. The GMFM score serves as a valuable tool for tracking changes in a child’s motor function over time, allowing clinicians to monitor progress, identify areas for improvement, and tailor interventions accordingly.
The interpretation of scores can be approached in several ways. One approach is to compare the child’s current GMFM score to their previous scores, looking for patterns of improvement or decline. This longitudinal analysis helps identify the effectiveness of interventions and provides insights into the child’s overall developmental trajectory. Additionally, comparing a child’s GMFM score to normative data for their age and diagnosis can provide a broader perspective on their functional abilities relative to their peers. This helps understand the severity of the child’s motor impairments and inform the development of targeted intervention strategies.
It is essential to remember that the GMFM score is just one piece of information within a comprehensive assessment of a child’s overall development. It should be considered alongside other assessments, such as medical records, functional assessments, and parental observations, to provide a complete picture of the child’s needs and develop a holistic intervention plan. The GMFM is a valuable tool for measuring progress and guiding treatment decisions but should be used in conjunction with other assessments to provide a comprehensive understanding of the child’s individual circumstances.
Applications and Research
The GMFM has proven invaluable in various applications, including clinical practice, research, and program evaluation. Its widespread use stems from its ability to objectively measure changes in gross motor function, providing a standardized tool for assessing treatment effectiveness and monitoring developmental progress. Clinicians utilize the GMFM to track individual children’s progress, identify areas requiring intervention, and tailor treatment plans based on specific needs. This tool allows for a more objective evaluation of a child’s motor function, leading to more targeted and effective interventions.
Research utilizing the GMFM has contributed significantly to understanding the development of children with cerebral palsy. Studies using this tool have explored the effectiveness of various interventions, including physical therapy, occupational therapy, and assistive technology. The GMFM has also been used to investigate the impact of factors like age, severity of disability, and environmental factors on motor function development. This research has informed the development of evidence-based interventions and contributed to improving the quality of care for children with cerebral palsy.
The GMFM’s standardized nature has made it a crucial tool for program evaluation. It allows for comparisons across different interventions and programs, helping identify effective practices and allocate resources strategically. The GMFM’s ability to measure small but significant changes in motor function allows for a more nuanced understanding of program effectiveness, leading to improvements in service delivery and outcomes for children with cerebral palsy. The GMFM’s versatility in clinical practice, research, and program evaluation has cemented its position as a vital tool for advancing the understanding and treatment of children with cerebral palsy.
About the author